Today we listened to four oral presentations about different forms of theatre. Mine was Theatre of the Oppressed. I actually really like this form of theatre, so i was pretty enthusiastic during my presentation and I think everyone unerstood what it was about pretty thoroughly. Mrs A suggested this could be something that I could use for my Independent Project, and that was an interesting idea!
This is the handout that we received from Maddie on:
Symbolism and Expressionism
By 1900 playwrights and directors began to use non-realistic forms and styles in their plays. Many European playwrights turned away from Realism and Naturalism and adopted techniques of symbolic and other non-realistic drama.
Symbolism in Drama
Symbolists ventured into the world of the subconscious mind and dreams. The Symbolists believed that it is possible to take all that we have seen and heard from our subconscious and bring it into harmony with our consciousness.
The symbolists urged viewers to look through the photo-like surface of appearances to discover more significant realities within – spiritual realities that the naturalists had ignored.
In their symbolist work, some early playwrights called for simple, evocative sets and relied primarily on the sounds and meanings of their poetic language to involve and inspire the audience.
Belgian playwright Maurice Maeterlinck (1862-1949) evokes a mood of mystery in his plays through multiple symbols, eerie sound effects, and ominous silences; with little overt action, at times relying as much on sound as sight.
Russian Vsevolod Meyerhold (1874-1940) had success with symbolism in his production of Hedda Gabler. He ignored, Ibsen’s realist stage directions and deployed bold colours and sculpted, repetitious movements to evoke the claustrophobia of Hedda’s world.
The basic ideal of Symbolism is the aesthetic autonomy of art. They used symbols to transcend what was normally considered ‘realistic’ in everyday life. They hoped that the symbols would take the audience beyond the truth to a higher level of understanding.
Characters were created in poetic terms. Ideas were expressed in sophisticated, abstract forms and terms, as opposed to the simplicity of Realism and Naturalism.
They created an abstract rather than a real world.
Lars Von Trier employs symbolism in his film Dogville in order to create focus on the characters, their story and message. He believes that by having little in the way of set and scenery, audiences will not be preoccupied by things that do not matter, not distracted from the acting and action.
Expressionism
Expressionism emerged as an avant-garde movement in the German theatre around 1910. Art critics had been using the term since the turn of the century to denote a non-realist painting suffused with the subjective emotions of the artist, and this general connotation was conferred on the new theatrical movement.
Early German expressionist plays called for such anti-realistic techniques as grotesquely-painted scenery, exaggerated acting and movement, and ‘telegraphic’ dialogue, so named because it copied the abbreviated, mechanistic quality of a telegraph message.
Its main aim was to transform nature rather than imitate it. The result of the transformation was often distortion.
Expressionism as a movement began with artists such as Edvard Munch as early as 1892. These artists turned observed reality to distorted reality in order to make both political and social points. Their art was not merely an imitation of reality, but a transformation of it.
Early expressionists explored the tensions between spiritual desires and material constraints. Although censorship before and during the First World War prevented most expressionist plays from reaching the stage, expressionism flourished in Germany immediately after the war.
Early expressionistic plays had tended to be liberal or anarchist in orientation. Optimism about the overthrow of conventional German society in the wake of German defeat in the war and revolution in Russia, however, turned expressionism toward utopian socialism.
In Expressionism, fantasy and symbolism are combined, as well as fragments of Realism and Naturalism, just as the dream sequences of the human mind.
Expressionism was a home-grown style (though not an avant-garde movement) in the US before American artists and audiences had seen much of it from Germany. American expressionists Eugene O’Neill (1888-1953) and Elmer Rice (1892-1967) used the term ‘expressionism’ to refer to the expressive culture movement, a broad-based programme in the US that sought to counter anxieties about new technologies by drawing on the performing arts.
Characters are more or less representative of states of mind, comparable to dreams, deliriums or opinions, in which appearance, time and space lose continuity. The playwright, then, ‘objectifies the subjective,’ that is, puts on stage the happenings inside the mind.
August Strindberg – A Dream Play
By the 1890’s August Strindberg had achieved as international reputation as a writer of historical epics and naturalist plays. After 1898 (and a difficult period of mental instability the dramatist called his ‘Inferno’), Strindberg strove for a theatre that he hoped might synthesise the materialism of naturalism with the spirituality of the symbolists. His post Inferno plays (To Damascus, A Dream Play 1902, The Ghost Sonata 1907) attempted to embody the experience of mythical journeys and spiritual dreams. Not surprisingly, theatre artists before 1914 had difficulty realizing Strindberg’s quest to merge external details and internal realities in theatrical images and sounds that would lead spectators toward both material and spiritual truths. Later productions of Strindberg’s post 1900 plays were more successful, and the plays widely read, exerting a significant influence on the European avant-garde, especially on a movement later termed German expressionism.
A Dream Play posits a disjuncture between an eternal world of abstract justice and the subjective, human world of pain and struggle, where eternity is a shadowy dream. The protagonist, Indra’s Daughter, journeys from the eternal world into the subjective realm and gradually loses her identity as the illusions of humanity draw her into the mire of human visuality.
– To establish this dream world on stage, Strindberg suggested the use of light, projections, and screens, techniques that derived from his fascination with photography.
– As in many symbolist dramas, Dream Play and Ghost Sonata, also make significant use of sound to suggest spiritual presences. The former involves several passages of ethereal music and invites singing, chanting and reciting poetry from its actors, while the latter features a singing milkmaid and a transformed figure in a closet who squawks like a parrot.
Unlike most symbolists, Strindberg never posited the superior reality of Platonic abstraction or spiritual transcendence over the concreteness of the material world. Instead, like the expressionists whom he influenced, Strindberg sought the realm of the spiritual in the material.
v “Avant-garde” was originally a French military term referring to the forward line of soldiers – those leading the charge into battle. Likewise, avant-garde artists thought of themselves as the front ranks of artistic progress, fighting bourgeois propriety to expand the boundaries of the possible. Avant-garde movements generally consisted of small groups of artists and spectators who reinforced each other in their rebellions against middle-class conventions and established cultural institutions, and in their desires for utopian change.
v The more important legacy of the avant-garde was its insistent challenge to conventional modes of making and enjoying theatre.
Through listening to Maddie’s presentation I’m beginning to understand the purpose of this theatre form. It makes us see perhaps the strageness of life, the script we looked at made almost no sense at all and this is symbolic of the life that we lead.
Theatre of the Absurd
I’m still not entirely sure about what this really involves, but I do have an understanding that similar to symbolism/expressionism, this theatre form allows us to see the absurdity of life and whether there is any point to our crazy routines.
This is what I did learn:
- that the sets, costumes, lighting and props can be anything and everything. Colour is used to be vivid and create atmosphere. The costumes do not have to resemble anything that we are used to, and the set can be as absurd as it wants to be!
- One aspect was that the audience would be sitting in chairs (that spun) in a circle, and the actors would surround them, making it very overwhelming
- a common theme is that of repetition. As an udience we may see something repeated any number of times. This is a way for the director to communicate the madness and absudirty of life. For example watching an order go through at McDonalds is something that is crazy, repetitive, yet a part of many people’s daily lives.
Theatre of the Absurd makes us really realise how crazy life is, or we are. It shows in an exaggerated way the ways of our society, and can cause one to realise the this, and even inspire some changes to be made about the way in which we live.
Theatre of Cruelty
To be honest- I hated this. I can see the ways in which the cruel nature of the tehatre can force us to really think about our society, to see the cruelty that exists in life, to make us question things that occur daily. It is there to shock the viewers, make them feel uncomfortable because they are faced with images of pure cruelty and violence.
- Bold colours such as that of red are used to emphasise what is going on on stage.
- Images can be shown, or be a part of the set, or the set is constructed in such as way that it communicates the cruelty or meaning/message of a show.
- ]
We watched a youtube video of Film of Cruelty (similar to TOC,) and it was disgusting. The man who was aiming to seduce the woman really disgusted me, and resonated with me for the rest of the day. I was shocked, disgusted and didn’t want to have anythign to do with this form of theatre, but it also made me see the reasons that TOC exists.
It makes us see the problems in our society, they may be exaggerated, but it shocks the audience into really thinking about things that they may not normally think about, because they are too controversial or cruel. This being said, I still don’t like this theatre form!!
***Next week we will be learning about Kathakali dance form the year elevens, and hopefully this will help me to understand a little more about this form of theatre, and the things that are involved when acting in it. ***
Read Full Post »